There’s a big problem with Obamacare: It’s not affordable for the middle class

Must read

Lucille Barrett
Lucille Barrett
Future teen idol. Hardcore tv lover. Social media guru. Zombie aficionado. Travel scholar. Biker, shiba-inu lover, audiophile, Mad Men fan and proud pixelpusher. Working at the junction of minimalism and elegance to answer design problems with honest solutions. I'm fueled by craft beer, hip-hop and tortilla chips.

If a married couple, both 62, in Hermon need health insurance, the lowest monthly premium is $1,288, or $15,456 per year. The median household income in Hermon for ages 45 to 64 is $67,384. This median or middle-class couple would pay 22.9 percent of their income. Is this premium affordable?

big problem

This couple likely could not and probably would not buy health insurance. But what about the tax penalty under the federal health care law? Wouldn’t it force the couple to make the purchase?

No, because of a little known and never talked about the federal rule. This rule states that if the lowest-cost plan’s premium is 8 percent or more of the household income, no penalty tax would be imposed. This couple will not be penalized.

But our devious plot thickens. The man gets sick, and he needs to be hospitalized. He has no health insurance.

(This writer had an MRI a few years ago in Bangor. The invoice indicated a “retail” price of $1,450 for the MRI. But I had a Medicare Advantage Plan, so the MRI provider reduced the price by $1,200 to $250, which is the amount Medicare would pay. The “retail” price was 580 percent more than the provider’s amount was willing to accept.)

Following his hospital stay, our middle-class male receives a $50,000 bill for medical services at the retail rate. The hospital will most likely negotiate a 15 percent or 20 percent reduction if he pays the balance on the spot. He is screwed. Without insurance, our patient would have to pay about $40,000 for his hospitalization immediately.

Could this middle-class couple have purchased other medical insurance? Yes. But this plot only gets worse. The couple could have purchased short-term major medical coverage. This plan is similar to the familiar major medical coverage. The premium would have been about 60 percent of the Affordable Care Act premium. These policies in other states can be written for 11-month terms and renewed two or more times. But Maine only allows two six-month terms Robot Tip.

The Affordable Care Act does not make sense. On the one hand, the federal government allows households with a certain income to escape the penalty tax. But on the other hand, Maine restricts alternative coverage, and the medical providers make going without coverage a financial disaster by charging grossly inflated retail rates.

The Affordable Care Act is not affordable to the middle class who don’t have access to employer-sponsored health insurance. In this case, insurance is unaffordable to those 62-year-olds whose income is between $63,720 and $134,000, costing between 24.2 percent and 11.5 percent of their income, respectively. But all the middle class is affected. For example, singles with income between $47,080 and $80,000, couples with income between $63,720 and $120,000, and four-member families with income between $97,000 and $190,000 all pay a portion of their income for health insurance that is unaffordable.

Here is salt to the wound. If the married couple’s income was $63,700 per year, a reduction of $3,684 would get a monthly $989 premium tax credit, or $11,868 annually. In other words, their monthly premium would take a colossal drop to $299 from $1,288.

More articles

Latest article